With a large number of Boston Bruins prospects in the NCAA – 16 of them – and classes underway, they will not be attending Bruins’ rookie camp and unable to take part in the Prospects Challenge in Buffalo beginning September 11, 2025. Under NCAA eligibility rules, players can not leave class to attend NHL camps.
Adding to the list of absentees are players competing in the U20 Nationell in Sweden and the MHL in Russia. With both leagues about to get underway, Liam Pettersson, Vashek Blanar, and KirillYemelyanov will be unavailable for camp participation.
As is the norm with the Boston Bruins, the rookie camp roster will be rounded out with invited players. While it’s uncommon for the team to sign an invitee post-camp, it has happened. Many of these prospects are eligible to re-enter the 2026 NHL Draft, giving the Bruins an early opportunity to evaluate potential future talent up close.
One name that jumps off the page is Dylan MacKinnon—a towering 6’2″, 202-pound right-shot defenseman who suited up last season for the Moncton Wildcats of the QMJHL. That’s the same squad where Loke Johansson made his mark. Not only did the two share a locker room, they anchored the blue line together as a reliable defensive pairing for much of the season.
MacKinnon was a third-round pick of the Nashville Predators – 83rd overall – at the 2023 Draft and went unsigned, making him an unrestricted free agent.
MacKinnon brings a punishing physical presence that makes him a tough matchup night in and night out. He’s fiercely loyal—quick to defend teammates—and his defensive instincts are already ahead of the curve. While he can carry the puck in transition, offense isn’t his primary contribution.
With no team currently lined up for the upcoming season, MacKinnon is actively pursuing a professional opportunity, and an AHL contract could be within reach.
“He’s the kind of guy you want on your bench when things get gritty,” said one scout. “Not flashy, but he’ll block shots, finish checks, and never backs down.”
Although MacKinnon may not project as an NHL regular, the Bruins still have to build a strong AHL lineup. Depth is a concern throughout the organization, but right-shot defense remains especially thin. To help shore up that weakness, Boston signed Swedish defenseman Victor Soderstrom as a free agent, bringing experience and a steady presence to a position in transition. MacKinnon could follow a similar path—development is unpredictable, and sometimes all it takes is the right opportunity to change a trajectory.
Emmanuel Vermette arrives at camp following a four-year stint with the Chicoutimi Saguenéens in the QMJHL. Although he was eligible for the 2023 NHL Draft, he went unselected—despite several independent scouting outlets projecting him as a potential fifth-round pick. Last season, Vermette tallied an impressive 30 goals and 35 assists over 64 games, bringing his career totals to 76 goals and 95 assists across 252 QMJHL appearances.
Maverick Lachance, a 5’11”, 174-pound center, is set to attend camp after going undrafted out of the QMJHL. Unless signed beforehand, he’ll be eligible to re-enter the draft in 2026. Last season with Sherbrooke, Lachance put up 34 goals and 25 assists across 52 games, bringing his two-season QMJHL totals to 61 goals and 47 assists in 119 games.
Ben Hrebik, a 6’2”, 190-pound netminder for the Barrie Colts in the OHL, drew some attention last season with a solid performance between the pipes. Over 34 games, he recorded a 2.87 goals-against average and a sharp .920 save percentage. On my final rankings for the 2025 NHL Draft, Hrebik landed as the fourth-highest rated goaltender. Much like they did in 2017 with Kyle Keyser, Hrebik could be some insurance at the minor league level in the event they lose a goaltender to waivers.
Oliver Turner stands out as an intriguing camp invite. The towering 6’5”, 205-pound right-shot defenseman played 14 games alongside Dean Letourneau two seasons ago, competing above his age group. After wrapping up his draft-year campaign at St. Andrew’s College last season, Turner made a brief jump to the OHL, suiting up for two games with the Erie Otters. Unless he secures an NHL contract, he’s set to re-enter the 2026 draft. The Bruins, however, already have some familiarity with his game.
Others invited to camp are: Dylan Edwards, Maverick Lachance, Mitchell Young and Grayson Burzynski.
It’s a debate that’s lingered for years: is the AHL a proving ground for prospects or a business built around winning? The truth, whether fans embrace it or not, lies somewhere in between. Development and results aren’t mutually exclusive—they’re two sides of the same coin.
Fans will passionately debate—often deep into the night—whether Providence should prioritize giving meaningful ice time to its younger prospects over relying on seasoned AHL veterans. There’s a valid case to be made for development-first thinking. But the reality is more layered: ownership values playoff revenue, even at the AHL level, and coaches eyeing NHL opportunities know that winning is often their ticket upward. And so, the tug-of-war continues—between growth and results, promise and performance.
Providence’s playoff run last season came to a frustrating halt. From the crease outward, the team was solid and well-structured, but when it mattered most, they simply ran out of steam.
There is no shortage of uncertainty for the upcoming season, particularly around roster construction. Many of those questions won’t be answered until the parent club wraps up training camp and finalizes its reassignments. Only then will the AHL lineup begin to take shape.
Today, I will look at the roster and how it shapes up compared to last season.
Goaltending
The last couple of seasons saw the goaltending as a strength for Providence. Goaltending as a whole in the organization was considered a strength. Now there are questions. From the top on down.
Michael DiPietro – the reigning AHL Goaltender of the Year is poised to compete for the backup role in Boston this season—a move that could leave a significant void in Providence’s crease. Fresh off signing a two-year, one-way deal in the offseason, DiPietro’s resurgence has been impressive, thanks in large part to Goaltending Coach Mike Dunham since acquiring him from Vancouver.
Simon Zajicek – signed as an unrestricted free agent out of Czechia, he arrives as a late bloomer with an intriguing skill set. While he adjusts to the pace and style of the North American game, he’s expected to compete for a backup role in Providence—a chance to prove himself and carve out a spot in the Bruins’ system. And it is possible he could compete for the starters role, depending on how things play out.
Luke Cavallin – Signed as an unrestricted free agent, Cavallin is a proven winner across multiple levels, with a resume full of individual accolades that often fly under the radar (and I’ll admit I’ve been guilty of that too). His performance en route to last season’s ECHL Championship was nothing short of elite. Though he brings just 12 games of AHL experience over four seasons, he’s poised to challenge for a backup role and could surprise if given the runway.
Joonas Korpisalo – Why is he on this list? Because if DiPietro earns the backup role in Boston and makes the most of it, Korpisalo’s path narrows to Providence—unless the Bruins manage to orchestrate a trade. It’s not the most efficient scenario from an asset management standpoint, but if DiPietro is viewed as a legitimate NHL option, then Korpisalo’s placement in Providence becomes a necessary consideration.
Defense
The blueline was also considered an area of strength in the organization and now, like the goaltending, there are plenty of questions.
Billy Sweezey – A seasoned presence on the blue line, Sweezey is exactly the kind of veteran every AHL team needs. His role goes beyond the stat sheet—he’s there to mentor the younger defensemen and help ease their transition into the pro game. With Providence expected to ice a particularly youthful defensive corps, having a steady, experienced figure like Sweezey is essential. Even if he’s a career AHL’er, his leadership and reliability are invaluable in shaping the next wave of talent.
Frederic Brunet – Among the names on this list, few have progressed as dramatically as Brunet. His offensive instincts were already well-established, but it’s the strides he’s made in his defensive play and physical presence that have truly elevated his game. With restricted free agency looming at season’s end, the Bruins are banking on his upward trajectory continuing. It took them several months to commit to his entry-level contract, but looking at his development now, there’s little doubt they made the right call.
Michael Callahan – Callahan surprised us with his solid play during a call-up to Boston last season, exceeding expectations in limited action. While cracking the Boston’s top seven defensemen this year may be a tall order, he remains a reliable depth option and could be one of the first call-ups in the event of injury—depending on the team’s needs at the time. At 25, he’s poised to take on a leadership role on the back end, offering a steady, shutdown presence on the blue line and helping guide younger players through their transition to the pro game.
Max Wanner – Acquired from Edmonton in the Trent Frederic trade, Wanner arrives in Boston’s system as a big, right-shot defenseman with raw tools and untapped potential. His time with the Oilers was marked by inconsistency, but he began to show signs of progress after joining Providence. With a full training camp ahead, Wanner will have the opportunity to acclimate to the Bruins’ system and build chemistry with his teammates. If he can harness his physicality and size while continuing to improve his puck-moving ability, he could evolve into the kind of shutdown presence the organization envisioned.
Ty Gallagher – After wrapping up his season at Colorado College, Gallagher signed an AHL-only deal and wasted no time making his presence felt on the Providence blue line. Known for his puck-moving ability and blistering shot, he’s a natural fit to quarterback the power play at the AHL level. His defensive game took notable strides during his college career, and that growth was evident in the postseason. Scratched for Providence’s playoff opener against Springfield—a game they dropped—Gallagher was reinserted into the lineup and immediately helped stabilize the back end, proving his value when it mattered most.
Jackson Edward – Edward didn’t see much ice time last season and was rarely deployed in pressure situations. To keep his development on track, the Bruins loaned him to the ECHL’s Maine Mariners, a familiar move in their strategy for grooming young, NHL-contracted defensemen. With Providence expected to roll out a youthful and relatively untested blue line, Edward will have a prime opportunity to secure a top-six role. One of his key assets is versatility—though a left shot, he’s spent the past three seasons playing primarily on the right side, giving him added value across pairings.
Loke Johansson – Johansson made significant strides in his first season in North America with the Moncton Wildcats of the QMJHL. Much like Edward last year and Brunet the year before, he’s expected to be brought along gradually—and unless he absolutely dazzles in camp, a stint with the Maine Mariners wouldn’t be surprising. It’s hard to bet against him. The Bruins have a well-earned reputation for taking a patient approach with young defensemen. Either way, his entry-level contract slides this season, so there’s no concern about burning a year. Personally, I’d rather see him logging meaningful minutes in Maine than sitting as a seventh or eighth option in Providence.
Jordan Harris & Victor Soderstrom – Both were signed as unrestricted free agents and are expected to compete for depth roles on Boston’s blue line, likely targeting the seventh or eighth defenseman slots. If the Bruins opt to carry eight defensemen—as they’ve done in the past—Providence’s lineup remains untouched. But if they go with seven, it creates a ripple effect, bumping everyone in Providence down a notch. Harris, with NHL experience and the ability to play both sides, likely has the inside track. Still, don’t overlook Soderstrom—the reigning SHL Defenseman of the Year—who brings high-end pedigree and could surprise in camp.
Jonathan Aspirot – His placement this low on the list is deliberate, and it reflects one key uncertainty: how the Bruins plan to deploy him. While Aspirot is primarily a defenseman, he’s shown versatility dating back to his junior days—capably stepping in at left wing when needed, including during his time with the Calgary Wranglers in the AHL. If he’s slotted on the blue line, he’s likely penciled into the top six, which could shift the entire defensive picture. With 30 goals and 125 points over 292 AHL games across seven seasons, Aspirot brings experience and flexibility that could prove valuable—depending on how Providence chooses to use him.
Zach Massicotte – Colin Felix – Both players inked one-year AHL deals with Providence during the offseason, signaling their roles as depth additions. They’re expected to start the season in Maine, but could be summoned to Providence if injuries or NHL call-ups leave the defense corps thin. Their presence adds a layer of insurance to the organization’s blue line depth.
Forwards
The uncertainty surrounding the forward group runs deep, starting at the top and trickling all the way down. Until training camp wraps up, it’s impossible to predict how things will ultimately shake out.
Matthew Poitras – Fraser Minten – Fabian Lysell – Matej Blumel – Alex Steeves – MaratKhusnutdinov – These six forwards will be locked in a competitive battle for what appears to be just two available roster spots in Boston. Those who don’t crack the NHL lineup will return to Providence, where they won’t just fill out the roster—they’ll shape it. Each brings top-six potential at the AHL level and could play a pivotal role in driving the offense and setting the tone for the season
Dans Locmelis – When his name was called at the 2022 NHL Draft, praise was scarce. But if you’ve been following along here or tuning into the podcast, you know I was one of the few who saw something in him early. Fast forward to now, and after just six games with Providence, some are ready to slot him into Boston’s lineup. Could he turn heads at camp? Absolutely. But despite his extensive international experience playing against men—a point I’ve emphasized often—I still don’t think he’s quite ready for that leap.
Brett Harrison – I was fully on board with drafting Harrison, believing that if he hit his ceiling, he could become a reliable third-line NHL contributor. But the reality is, he hasn’t come close to fulfilling that promise. There were encouraging signs at rookie camp last year and during the Prospects Challenge, but the momentum faded fast. Now entering the final year of his entry-level contract, he’ll need a breakout season to re-establish his trajectory. At this point, I’m not banking on it.
Georgii Merkulov – Despite ranking third all-time in scoring for the Providence Bruins, Merkulov has yet to receive a true opportunity to crack Boston’s lineup—much to the frustration of fans. His decision to re-sign with the organization this summer, rather than head to the KHL, caught many by surprise. But it speaks to his commitment: Merkulov wants to make it work here. That said, his game is heavily reliant on offensive production. If he’s not generating points, his overall impact diminishes—and the Bruins have never been shy about valuing complete, two-way play. Whether his offseason work translates into a breakthrough remains to be seen.
Riley Tufte – Coming off a solid season in Providence, Tufte re-upped with the organization largely to serve as a mentor for the younger players. Realistically, his chances of cracking Boston’s lineup are slim, though he could be a serviceable call-up for a handful of games. What he brings—consistency, effort, and professionalism—is exactly what the prospects need to see firsthand. There’s real value in having someone like Tufte model what it takes to succeed, even if it’s not in the NHL spotlight. No complaints from me about him anchoring that role in Providence.
Dalton Bancroft – After wrapping up his season at Cornell, Bancroft joined the organization as a free agent and made an immediate impression by scoring his first pro goal in limited action. He was a reliable offensive contributor in Junior A and showed flashes of that scoring touch in college, particularly during his sophomore year. At the pro level, though, he projects more as a dependable secondary scorer. He’s got good size, skates well for his frame, and brings a steady defensive presence. Where he ultimately slots into the lineup is still up in the air, but there’s enough in his toolkit to keep him in the conversation in the top nine.
John Farinacci – A dependable two-way forward, Farinacci isn’t going to light up the scoresheet, but he brings consistent effort and responsible play in all three zones. He projects as a third-line contributor who can chip in with secondary scoring and anchor defensive assignments. Boston recognized his work ethic with a brief NHL call-up, where he made the most of it—scoring his first NHL goal in his lone appearance. While top-six minutes in Providence aren’t likely, he’s the kind of player coaches trust to do the little things right.
Patrick Brown – The Bruins’ decision to re-sign Brown didn’t sit well with most fans, and that sentiment tends to resurface whenever he’s called up. But like Sweezey and Tufte, Brown plays a crucial role behind the scenes—he’s the kind of veteran presence who helps guide younger players through the grind. If those prospects don’t follow his example, that’s on them, not on Brown. While he’s not a flashy option, the reality is that if Boston needs a short-term fourth-line center, Brown is the more sensible call-up over someone like Matthew Poitras. He knows the role, plays it responsibly, and doesn’t need development minutes.
Riley Duran – Entering the final year of his two-year ELC, Duran’s stock has cooled considerably since last season, when many had him pegged as a potential roster candidate. This year? Crickets. It’s a reminder that hype doesn’t always translate. Still, there’s plenty to appreciate in Duran’s game. He’s not going to drive offense, but he brings energy, a relentless forecheck, and a sound defensive presence. Cracking a top-nine role in Providence will be a challenge, but as a fourth-line piece, he could offer real value and reliability.
Jeffrey Viel – There’s a spot for Viel on this roster—the question is where. His presence alone will push younger players to play with more edge, knowing he’s got their backs. But Viel isn’t just muscle; he’s a capable contributor, averaging around 0.5 points per game at the AHL level. At 28, he’ll be one of the elder statesmen in Providence, expected to lead by example both on and off the ice. A call-up to Boston seems unlikely given the offseason additions, but his value in the room and on the ice remains undeniable for Providence.
Jake Schmaltz – Schmaltz’s fit in Providence will be one to watch. Signed to an AHL-only deal, he’s carved out a niche as a defensive specialist, which likely limits his role to the bottom of the lineup. Top-six or even top-nine minutes seem out of reach for now, so expect him to rotate in and out of the lineup—and potentially log some time in Maine as well.
Joey Abate – Abate is on an AHL-only deal, and frankly, Viel fills his role more effectively. With a wave of forwards expected to trickle down once Boston finalizes its camp cuts, Abate looks like the odd man out—or at least he should be. At this stage, the Bruins would be wise to prioritize prospects on NHL contracts who have a clearer path to development.
Ty Cheveldayoff – Erik Middendorf – Brooklyn Kalmikov – All three are on AHL-only deals and, barring a standout performance in camp, are likely bound for Maine. Their primary role is depth—ready to step in if injuries hit Providence or if Boston’s roster moves create a ripple effect. They’re here as insurance, not impact players.
From the goaltending on out, this does not appear to be as strong a roster as last season even with the questions surrounding the forwards, at least on paper. But, that’s why they play the games. Everyone is going to have to buy into the system and some players are going to have to step up.
Providence will want to deploy the same basic system that Boston uses. It makes it easier for players to move up when needed. We just don’t know what that system looks like in its entirety at this point.
With the 2025–2026 hockey season fast approaching, Boston Bruins prospects are already arriving—or soon will be—at their respective training camps. As is tradition each preseason, I take a deep dive into the Bruins’ pipeline, evaluating talent across the globe. Using my own projection model, I break down what fans should realistically expect from each prospect in the months ahead.
I get it—there’s always a bit of skepticism when it comes to the model I use, and I’m more than willing to acknowledge that. But the results speak for themselves: it’s consistently outperformed other projection systems, to the point where even one NHL team has adopted it internally. With that said, let’s dive into the offensive projections for each player heading into the 2025–2026 season. I’ll follow up with a quick thought of each prospect.
Just a quick update before we proceed: The J20 Nationell, Sweden’s top junior league, has officially changed its name to the U20 Nationell. Unlike the CHL and USHL, the Swedish junior teams are affiliated with the pro teams in the Allsvenskan and SHL.
Here are the model’s projections for the 2025-26 season:
Liam Pettersson – 6’2” – 170 lbs – Left Defense – Växjö Lakers HC – J20 Nationell (Sweden)
After tallying 6 goals and 15 assists with Växjö last season—and earning a well-deserved 5-game stint in the SHL—Pettersson enters the new campaign poised to build on those numbers. The league’s style plays to his strengths: mobile defensemen who can transition smoothly and fire the puck with precision. While any offensive uptick is certainly a bonus, my primary focus will be on his defensive game, especially his gap control, which has been a recurring concern, and his overall consistency shift to shift.
After tallying 6 goals and 15 assists in the J18 last season, Blanar steps up to the J20, where—much like Pettersson—his style of play fits seamlessly into the league’s pace and structure. A 2025 draft pick that had fans and hockey people asking “Who?”, Blanar turned heads at the Bruins’ summer development camp, emerging as a standout performer. This season, I’ll be keeping a close eye on how his defensive game evolves. With both Blanar and Pettersson competing in the J20 Södra division, expect plenty of compelling head-to-head battles between these rising talents.
Yemelyanov was a calculated swing by the Bruins in the sixth round this June—a long-term project with intriguing upside. A true two-way center, he thrives in all three zones and brings a reliable 200-foot game to the ice. While his track record leans more toward goal scoring than playmaking, he’s shown flashes of creativity with the puck. After notching 13 goals and 10 assists in the MHL last season, expectations are high. A breakout campaign feels imminent, and anything short of a point-per-game pace would fall below the bar.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Loko Yaroslavl
MHL
35
13
10
23
PROJECTED
Loko Yaroslavl
MHL
52
33
29
62
Yemelyanov’s schedule begins September 8.
Casper Nassen – 6’4” – 214 lbs – Left Wing/Right Wing – Miami University (Ohio)
Since being selected by the Bruins in the seventh round of the 2023 draft, Nassen’s trajectory has been anything but smooth. His draft-plus-one year began sluggishly and was further derailed by injury. Last season with Miami was a tough watch—just three wins, all coming in the opening month, and little to build on after that. Looking ahead, the outlook remains dim. While his growing experience suggests there should be some improvement, expectations should be tempered—it’s likely to be a modest step forward at best.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Miami (Ohio)
NCAA
34
6
4
10
PROJECTED
Miami (Ohio)
NCAA
34
8
11
19
Nassen’s schedule begins October 3.
Will Zellers – 5’10” – 176 lbs – Center/Left Wing – University of North Dakota
Zellers wasted no time making an impression after joining the Bruins organization, quickly rising to the ranks of their top prospects. He dominated the USHL last season, showcasing elite production. Now stepping into his freshman year at North Dakota, he’ll face a significant jump in competition—but projections suggest he’s more than capable of keeping pace. With North Dakota’s strong development system, especially their emphasis on the 200-foot game, Zellers is in the right environment to round out his skill set and continue his upward trajectory.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Green Bay Gamblers
USHL
52
44
27
71
PROJECTED
University of North Dakota
NCAA
34
12
10
22
Zellers’ schedule begins October 10.
Oskar Jellvik – 5’11” – 181 lbs – Center/Left Wing – Boston College
After a standout 2023–24 campaign, last season was a frustrating setback—injuries cut things short just as the conversation around turning pro was starting to heat up. Now entering his senior year, the hope is simple: a clean bill of health and a return to form. Projecting Boston College prospects remains tricky, largely due to the uncertainty around line combinations. That said, one pairing we can count on is Jellvik and Gasseau—whose chemistry has been proven and should anchor the second line.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Boston College
NCAA
23
4
9
12
PROJECTED
Boston College
NCAA
34
11
28
39
Jellvik’s schedule begins October 3.
Andre Gasseau – 6’4” – 218 lbs – Center/Left Wing – Boston College
Gasseau enters his senior year wearing a letter, a testament to his leadership and steady presence on the ice. While there was plenty of buzz among fans about a potential jump to the pros after last season, that didn’t materialize. Statistically, his point totals have remained consistent—29, 29, and 30 over the past three seasons—and he’s projected to land in a similar range again. However, the numbers don’t tell the full story. His overall game has matured noticeably, with improvements in areas like defensive responsibility and puck management and skating. As noted earlier, his chemistry with Jellvik continues to be a bright spot, and there’s hope that duo will keep driving play this season.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Boston College
NCAA
36
15
15
30
PROJECTED
Boston College
NCAA
36
15
16
31
Dean Letourneau – 6’7” – 214 lbs – Center/Right Wing – Boston College
It’s surprising how quickly some fans have labeled Letourneau a bust. That judgment may prove accurate in time, but right now, it feels premature. By all indications, he’s checked every box this offseason to prepare himself for a stronger campaign—and his showing at development camp was encouraging. The real question now is where he slots into Boston College’s lineup: will it be on the wing down the middle? Given last year’s numbers, it won’t take much to show statistical improvement. What would you call a success?
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Boston College
NCAA
36
0
3
3
PROJECTED
Boston College
NCAA
36
7
11
18
Kristian Kostadinski – 6’6” – 220 lbs – Left Defense – Boston College
I’m genuinely excited to follow Kostadinski’s progress this season. The biggest question on my mind is whether his skating has taken a step forward—because if it hasn’t, he risks being exposed at this level. His physical presence is undeniable, and his work ethic is never in doubt. Given the firepower in BC’s offense, he should be able to chip in from the blueline, even if my model doesn’t currently predict it. Expect some early growing pains, but as he finds his footing, he has the tools to settle in and make an impact, at least in the defensive zone.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Dubuque Fighting Saints
USHL
62
6
10
16
PROJECTED
Boston College
NCAA
36
1
8
9
James Hagens – 5’10” – 185 lbs – Center – Boston College
After averaging a point per game last season without needing to carry the load, Hagens now steps into full command—this is undeniably his team. Not only will he be the engine of his line, but the driving force behind the entire roster. A stat line of 21 goals and 28 assists might seem ambitious, but it’s well within reach, as is the coveted Hobey Baker Award. With his pro future looming, this season likely marks his final shot at a national championship. The only remaining question: will he start his professional journey in Providence, or will Boston accelerate his path and burn a year off his entry-level contract to bring him straight to the big stage?
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Boston College
NCAA
37
11
26
37
PROJECTED
Boston College
NCAA
36
21
28
49
William Moore – 6’3” – 181 lbs – Center/Left Wing – Boston College
Moore slid to Boston at pick 51, a surprising drop for a player projected as first-round material. His standout season with the NTDP only reinforced what scouts have known since his days lighting up the Greater Toronto Hockey League—his offensive instincts are high-end and consistently scale with competition. Now comes the biggest leap of his career, and all eyes are on whether that scoring touch holds at this level. While linemates will influence his impact, Moore has the ability to generate offense on his own—and that’s exactly what I am banking on.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
USNTDP U18
NTDP
64
27
32
59
2024-2025
USNTDP
USHL
25
10
11
21
PROJECTED
Boston College
NCAA
36
10
18
28
Elliott Groenewold – 6’2” – 201 lbs – Left Defense – Quinnipiac University
Longtime readers will remember I was high on Groenewold last season—and for good reason. As an 18-year-old freshman, he delivered a strong campaign. My model’s projection of 3 goals and 8 assists was achieved by netting 4 goals and matching the 8 helpers. This year, the model expects him to nearly double that production. I’m skeptical he’ll hit those numbers, but if he does—and continues to refine an already impressive defensive game—it’ll be a major step forward. He’s easily the player I’ll be watching most closely this season with curiosity.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Quinnipiac University
NCAA
38
4
8
12
PROJECTED
Quinnipiac University
NCAA
36
8
14
22
Groenewold’s schedule begins October 3.
Chris Pelosi – 6’1” – 181 lbs – Center – Quinnipiac University
Last season, the model projected Pelosi to notch 25 points—a number that seemed ambitious for a freshman, even to me—but a stellar second half proved it achievable. This year, the expectation is steadier output, which drives the projected bump in production. With the center role becoming increasingly competitive in the Bruins system, I’d like to see Pelosi get reps on the wing, where his instincts, pace, and spatial awareness could thrive. His game feels naturally suited to that position, and it might offer a clearer path to the NHL.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Quinnipiac University
NCAA
38
13
11
24
PROJECTED
Quinnipiac University
NCAA
36
17
15
32
Jonathan Morello – 6’1” – 192 lbs – Center/Left Wing – Boston University
Morello was one of the few prospects who significantly underperformed relative to last season’s projections. While I appreciated many aspects of his game—especially his strong defensive presence and history as an offensive contributor—his lack of production was a real letdown. That said, this year’s projection might not be eye-catching, but for a freshman with two-way capabilities, it’s a respectable starting point and leaves room for growth.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Dubuque Fighting Saints
USHL
59
8
20
28
PROJECTED
Boston University
NCAA
36
6
10
16
Morello’s schedule begins October 4.
Beckett Hendrickson – 6’2” – 174 lbs – Left Wing – University of Minnesota
Hendrickson was another prospect who fell well short of expectations last season, though there were a few encouraging signs. He played on one of the NCAA’s most effective fourth lines and, at times, was the driving force behind its success. When called upon to step into a higher role due to injuries, he showed flashes of production—but those opportunities were limited. With lower projections heading into this season, he’ll need to capitalize on an expected move up the lineup and deliver meaningful results to re-establish his trajectory.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
University of Minnesota
NCAA
39
3
9
12
PROJECTED
University of Minnesota
NCAA
36
9
14
22
Hendrickson’s schedule begins October 3.
Ryan Walsh – 6’1” – 187 lbs – Center/Right Wing – Cornell University
Last season, Walsh matched his goal projection with 17, though he came up four assists shy of the expected 18. This year, the model anticipates further growth from one of Boston’s most quietly effective prospects. Over his first two NCAA seasons, he’s shown a clear shift toward goal scoring over playmaking, and the model reflects that trajectory. At this point, the bigger question isn’t whether he’ll meet expectations—it’s whether he’ll make the jump to the pro ranks when the season wraps.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Cornell University
NCAA
36
17
14
31
PROJECTED
Cornell University
NCAA
36
21
18
39
Walsh’s season begins October 31.
Mason Langenbrunner – 6’3” – 194 lbs – Right Defense – Harvard University
Langenbrunner entered last season without a goal since 2022–23, and early signs pointed to more of the same. Limited ice time kept him quiet until midseason, when something shifted—his play elevated, and he began to make a noticeable impact. Now, he heads into his senior year as Harvard’s captain, carrying momentum and confidence. With the Bruins thin on right-shot defensemen, there’s a plausible path to a pro contract. That said, Harvard’s track record is worth noting: more alumni have reached the NHL without signing with the team that drafted them than any other program, with Adam Fox, Jimmy Vesey, and Alex Kerfoot standing as prominent examples.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Harvard University
NCAA
33
6
4
10
PROJECTED
Harvard University
NCAA
34
5
11
16
Langenbrunner’s season begins October 31.
Cooper Simpson – 6’1” – 179 lbs – Left Wing/Right Wing – Youngstown Phantoms (USHL)
Simpson put together a strong campaign with Shakopee High School in Minnesota before making a seamless transition to the USHL, where he tallied 7 goals in just 9 games with the Tri-City Storm. Despite the limited sample size, the left-shot winger—capable of playing both flanks—demonstrated that his offensive skill set can carry over to higher levels. The projection model sees that momentum continuing into the upcoming season, albeit at a more sustainable pace than the scoring surge he closed with last year.
Despite showing offensive flashes at lower levels, Chandler’s first two seasons in the QMJHL were hampered by injuries, limiting his development curve. Still, he profiles as a reliable, hard-working two-way forward with the potential to carve out a role as a defensive specialist who can contribute modestly on the scoresheet. While high-end production isn’t expected this season, the model projects solid, respectable numbers. His long-term trajectory remains uncertain, but there’s a foundation in place worth monitoring.
TEAM
LEAGUE
GP
G
A
PTS
2024-2025
Shawinigan Cateractes
QMJHL
64
13
19
32
PROJECTED
Shawinigan Cateractes
QMJHL
68
21
33
54
Conclusion:
This is arguably the most talented crop of Bruins prospects in recent memory—and not solely due to the arrival of James Hagens. The organization made a deliberate push at the 2025 draft to prioritize pure skill, and it shows. When combined with the skilled assets already in the pipeline, there’s genuine reason for optimism about the future.
But it’s not just finesse. The group also features a gritty blend of physical, hard-nosed players who are tough to play against. And rounding it out are the workhorses—the ones who grind in the corners, win puck battles, and do the thankless jobs that rarely make the highlight reel but are essential to winning hockey.
There’s no question these players have plenty of development ahead, but watching their journey unfold throughout the season promises to be an exciting ride. At the very least, it’ll be compelling to see how each one rises to the challenge.
To look back at last season’s results, click here.
Ask fans, and you’ll find an uneven split. Some feel Lysell has been given a fair shake, while others are frustrated with management for failing to give their young talent a real shot—especially after last season’s trade deadline teardown, when the team seemed primed for a youth movement.
Last week, I noted that the Edmonton Oilers had asked the Bruins about Fabian Lysell. That small detail quickly took on a life of its own—spreading across social media and bleeding into mainstream outlets, sparking all kinds of trade chatter. Some even speculated that Matthew Savoie or other Oilers prospects could be part of a potential return. It didn’t take long for voices on the Oilers media side to surface and shoot down those rumors.
Just to set the record straight: that speculation didn’t come from me. The reality is, the Bruins and Oilers could’ve been engaged in any number of conversations, and at some point, Lysell’s name may have come up. That kind of inquiry doesn’t guarantee a deal—it might spark further talks, or it might go nowhere. Still, the fact they asked suggests there’s at least some level of interest.
Naturally, I’ve been asked to name my source—but I won’t put anyone in that position. What I can say is this: the information comes from a trusted friend and former business associate with enough standing inside the Oilers organization to be well-informed on the matter.
This leads to today’s discussion: Has Lysell been given a fair opportunity with the Bruins? Let’s go back to the beginning.
On June 29, 2020, the Vancouver Giants selected Lysell with the 30th overall pick in the CHL Import Draft. A year later, the Boston Bruins made him their first-round choice, taking him 21st overall in the 2021 NHL Entry Draft. Shortly after, on August 9, 2021, the Bruins signed Lysell to a three-year entry-level contract and loaned him back to the Giants for the 2021–22 season. Because he signed at age 18, his contract was eligible to slide for up to two years—unless he appeared in 10 NHL games.
Lysell’s season with the Vancouver Giants was a standout from an offensive standpoint. He tallied 22 goals and 40 assists over 53 regular-season games, then elevated his play in the postseason with 4 goals and 17 assists in just 12 appearances. While his offensive production was undeniably impressive, it became clear that he still needed development to fit the mold of a “Bruins-style” player. Whether that archetype remains relevant in today’s game is a debate best saved for another time.
In the summer of 2022, I advocated for Lysell to return to the WHL for another season—a stance that, unsurprisingly, drew pushback from passionate Bruins fans. Ultimately, the organization took a different view, opting to place Lysell in the AHL, signaling their belief that he was ready for the next step in his development.
Lysell recorded 14 goals and 23 assists over 54 games in his first AHL season, but also posted a career-worst minus-12 rating. It was during the World Junior Championships, however, that concerns about his overall game became harder to ignore. The issue wasn’t his lack of production—going pointless in seven games—but rather his noticeable lack of defensive engagement. When I pointed that out, it once again stirred backlash from Bruins fans on social media.
The 2023–24 campaign marked his most productive AHL season yet, tallying 15 goals and 35 assists over 56 games. It appeared he was finally rounding into form. However, this past season saw a dip in output, with 11 goals and 23 assists across 52 games. On the bright side, he earned a 12-game stint with the NHL squad following the trade deadline, registering one goal and two assists—all of which came in his final four appearances. His postseason performance in the AHL was less encouraging, managing just two assists in seven games. Through 11 career playoff games at that level, he’s still searching for his first goal
For me, this isn’t about whether Lysell has been given a fair shot by the Bruins. The real issue is trying to mold a player with his unique skill set into something he’s not. At face value, it seems like that’s exactly what the Bruins are attempting. Whether it’s Loke Johansson being sent to Moncton Wildcats (QMJHL) with a checklist of things to fix, or Matthew Poitras landing in Providence with a development plan in hand, the key isn’t just identifying areas for growth—it’s making sure these players are placed in environments where they can actually thrive.
Lysell possesses high caliber offensive tools, particularly his skating, which stands out as singular within the organization. However, his deployment in both Providence and Boston raises questions about developmental strategy. In Providence, he has not consistently been placed in high-leverage offensive roles that would maximize his scoring potential. Similarly, his usage in Boston has not reflected a commitment to testing his ceiling in favorable conditions.
This leads to a critical evaluation point: given his raw offensive talent, it is essential to assess whether Lysell can produce at a rate that compensates for any defensive shortcomings. Without placing him in situations designed to optimize output—such as top-six minutes, power play opportunities, and offensive zone starts—the organization risks missing a key data point in his progression: can he outscore his mistakes?
Consider a few data points: In Boston, Lysell ranked 16th in average power play time on ice (TOI), trailing players such as Ian Mitchell, Vinni Lettieri, Marat Khusnutdinov, and Georgii Merkulov—none of whom possess the offensive acumen Lysell does. Additionally, Lysell received offensive zone starts at a rate of 56.0%. For context, Oliver Wahlstrom—another player the Bruins were actively trying to unlock offensively and lacks Lysell’s offensive flair—was given 61.0%. These deployment patterns suggest a relatively conservative approach to Lysell’s usage, which may have limited opportunities to fully evaluate his offensive ceiling.
Ty Anderson of 98.5 The Sports Hub has spoken extensively about this issue on the Sports Hub Underground podcast (11:23 mark). In episodes like “The Ceiling” and “They’re Doing It Again,” he and Matt Dolloff dissect how the Bruins’ deployment choices reflect broader organizational tendencies—often favoring veterans or low-risk options over giving young talent meaningful runway to develop. Anderson has pointed out that Boston’s handling of development camp and free agency sends mixed signals about their long-term strategy, especially when promising players are buried in the depth chart or given limited roles.
IF the Bruins are willing to part with Lysell, what is his worth? I know a lot of names are being thrown out there from the Oilers and again, none of them came from me. If you ask around hockey circles, opinions vary. Said one AHL executive to me, “I don’t know what to make of it. I don’t think he’s in the best situations to fully evaluate.” Another said “What you see is what you get. I don’t think he could ever play up to his ceiling.”
At this point, I would put him in the best offensive positions for an extended period of time and let him loose. Now is the time to sink or swim for him. That may be the greatest value to the Bruins at this point.
For players, fans and country, it is about winning so a big congratulations to the Team USA players and their fans. It was well deserved after knocking out the top two teams in the tournament.
For NHL General Managers and their staff, the focus is on individual players, as this tournament marks the first opportunity to scout prospects eligible for this season’s draft. I always stress that you shouldn’t place too much weight on a single event—but at this point in the year, it offers an early glimpse of players worth tracking throughout the long season ahead.
As I mentioned in the preview, several top players were unavailable—some had aged out, others were sidelined by injuries, and in the case of Team USA, they traditionally don’t ice their strongest roster for this tournament. Even so, a number of players delivered standout performances, and a few lower-ranked prospects made a strong case to be watched more closely moving forward.
Let’s take a look at some of the players:
TEAM USA
Blake Zielinski – Elite playmaking skills that made his linemates better. The American’s best player.
Jack Hextall – High end puck handling skills to match his speed and IQ. Drives puck possession.
Nikita Klepov – Known for his shot generation so, more offense was expected of him.
TEAM SWEDEN
Marcus Nordmark – Known for his offense, he didn’t disappoint. One of the best players in the tournament.
Nils Bartholdsson – Surprised at his playmaking skills from the wing. One of the best in the tournament.
Oscar Holmertz – Another shot generator that didn’t disappoint. High end vision and IQ.
TEAM CANADA
Keaton Verhoeff – Started the tournament off strong but had a tough semifinal. Did not hurt his draft stock.
Tynan Lawrence – Makes plays, grinds it out, battles, never loses a shift. Will be a leader one day.
Ethan Belchetz – Big strong power forward with skill rarely loses a battle. He could be the next one.
TEAM FINLAND
Samu Alalauri – In my opinion, the Finns best defenseman from start to finish. Smart, moves the puck, strong defensively.
Oliver Suvanto – What stood out was his energy on both sides of the puck. As relentless on the backcheck as he is to get to the front of the net.
Oscar Hemming – Size, skill, IQ and a big shot generator. Consistency was an issue at this tournament, but there is lots to like.
TEAM CZECHIA
Frantisek Poletin – Thought of as one of the top goaltenders in the draft, he showed why. Has been a top international goalie for his age group.
Filip Novak – Very good on both sides of the puck. Engine never quits and can make opponents pay the price. Excellent shot.
Ondrej Ruml – Was a big minute eater on the blueline and the best on the Czechs in transitioning. He needs to work on his consistency.
TEAM SLOVAKIA
Samuel Hrenak – Keeps on building a name for himself in the crease. He was composed throughout and had some big saves.
Adam Goljer – Smart defenseman who strong defensively and physical and can make plays. I was a little disappointed though, but there is plenty to work with.
TEAM SWITZERLAND
Yanis Lutz – Playmaking winger who likes to rush the puck. Plays with a lot of effort and pace. Would like him to be more physical.
Fabrice Bouvard – Caught me by surprise. Played in all situations and put up some points. Incredibly strong for a smaller player.
Pascal Kunz – The goaltender played calm and cool, showed great reflexes and his excellent mobility. But at 6’0”. Size will be questioned.
TEAM GERMANY
Darian Rolsing – Germany’s best player, huge defenseman that is very good in his own zone and showed some offensive flair.
Anton Rockl – Rolsing may be the only German that will get drafted, but if Rockl were a few inches taller, he’d likely get a look from an NHL team.
So, what does this mean for the Bruins? While I haven’t broken down every player, the takeaway is clear: with two first-round picks in hand—assuming they hold onto both—they’re in a strong position to land two high-caliber NHL talents in the 2026 draft. That would nicely complement the additions they’ve already made. Of course, that all hinges on them staying the course.
This draft season promises to be intriguing, to say the least. What’s certain, though, is that the 2026 class is shaping up to be both high in quality and deeper than what we saw in 2025. I’m excited to see how it all unfolds in the lead-up to June and will be here every step of the way.
Next up on the docket is the CHL – USA Prospects Challenge where the top CHL players face off against the NTDP Under-18 squad. The two-game set takes place on Tuesday November 25 at the Scotiabank Saddledome in Calgary while the second game takes place Wednesday November 26 at the VisitLethbridge.com Arena in Lethbridge.
Last season, 16 of the 22 players that skated for the CHL were selected in the first round on the 2025 NHL Entry Draft.
Help is on the way, but don’t expect it overnight.
James Hagens could make his debut as early as spring 2026, bringing a fresh spark to the lineup. Two additional first-round draft picks are slated to be selected in June 2026—assuming the Bruins make the smart move. Meanwhile, Fraser Minten and Matthew Poitras are projected to elevate their game during this period, with Will Moore and William Zellers also showing strong potential on the horizon. But it’s going to take time and more importantly, patience.
General Manager Don Sweeney has publicly stated that making the playoffs is the ultimate goal this season. But does he truly believe it? Only Sweeney can answer that. For a team in transition, the Bruins have a long road ahead. So why not aim for both—progress and a playoff push?
The core players for the future are clear. It’s the rest of the roster that raises more questions than answers. And what better time than a transitional phase to discover who truly belongs on the team in the years to come?
Let’s start in net. Jeremy Swayman is signed through 2032, and all eyes are on him for a bounce-back season. Behind him, Joonas Korpisalo has three years left on his deal, while Michael DiPietro just inked a two-year, one-way contract this offseason. It’s tough to move on from Korpisalo when DiPietro remains an unknown at the NHL level.
It’s hard to imagine a scenario where Korpisalo’s contract gets renewed once it expires—assuming he’s still with the organization by then. That makes it all the more important for the team to evaluate whether DiPietro can handle the role of an NHL backup. The only way to find out is by giving him actual NHL starts. Some believe that placing DiPietro on waivers for a Providence assignment would lead to another NHL team claiming him. That’s possible, but ultimately, it’s a gamble with no guarantees.
The Bruins have both time and cap flexibility to carry three goaltenders through October, giving DiPietro a chance to start and prove whether he’s a viable option moving forward. Once they’ve seen enough, they’ll be in a position to make an informed decision.
On the blue line, much of the Bruins’ flexibility hinges on the health of Hampus Lindholm and CharlieMcAvoy—and whether the late-season version of Nikita Zadorov resurfaces. Mason Lohrei was thrust into challenging situations last season before he was fully ready, but to his credit, he handled the pressure with poise and never lost confidence.
Granting Lohrei, the first-unit power play responsibilities could serve the team well, easing the workload on McAvoy and Lindholm. However, it shouldn’t be a case of ‘it’s yours until you mess up.’ With a new coach and system in place, Lohrei deserves the same runway as the rest of the unit to adapt and grow. If adjustments are needed, a transition to McAvoy by November remains a viable option.
But the uncertainties go beyond surface-level decisions. Henri Jokiharju, acquired at last season’s trade deadline, was signed to a three-year extension with the expectation that he can anchor the second-pairing right-shot role. If he falters, Andrew Peeke stands as the fallback option. Early wins will be crucial for this group, and it’s fair to question whether the organization will have the patience to stay the course if results don’t materialize right away.
The Bruins added Jordan Harris in the offseason—a versatile defenseman with NHL experience who can play both sides. His presence raises questions about how short the leash might be for others on the blue line. Victor Soderstrom, last season’s SHL Defenseman of the Year, remains a long shot, but his $350,000 AHL salary hints that the organization intends to give him a real opportunity. MichaelCallahan stepped in sporadically last season and held his own. Beyond that, however, the depth chart thins out quickly. Any significant injury to McAvoy or Lindholm could leave the team dangerously exposed.
Whether it’s one of the defensemen already mentioned or Frederic Brunet, now is the time to evaluate who truly belongs on the roster two or three years down the line. Give them a meaningful look and assess whether they have a legitimate shot at being part of the team’s future. If not, the sooner they move on the better.
Beyond David Pastrnak, Elias Lindholm, and Morgan Geekie, the Bruins’ forward group is a patchwork of stopgaps and uncertainties. Trade rumors continue to swirl around Pavel Zacha and Casey Mittelstadt, refusing to fade. The five-year contract to Tanner Jeannot raises eyebrows, while John Beecher is on a one-year ‘prove-it’ deal.
Up front is where the Bruins need to focus most of their experimentation. Minten and Poitras should be given every chance to show they’re not only future Bruins, but capable contributors. Then there’s 22-year-old Fabian Lysell, whose contract expires at season’s end, making him a restricted free agent. After five seasons under team control, it’s time to find out whether he’s an NHL-caliber player with a future in Boston. If not, then it is time to move on.
Sweeney and the Bruins struck gold with the free-agent signing of Geekie two seasons ago. Now, with the additions of Matej Blumel and Alex Steeves, plus the extension of Marat Khusnutdinov following last season’s trade deadline acquisition, it seems they’re hoping for another spark. Mittelstadt could be part of that gamble too. But how long is the leash if things go sideways early? The Bruins aren’t exactly known for offering players extended runway to prove they belong. In fact, they have a reputation for doing the opposite.
With Mark Kastelic signed for three years and both Michael Eyssimont and Sean Kuraly brought in on two-year deals, where does that leave Beecher’s chance to earn meaningful ice time? For him to get a real opportunity, someone would need to shift to the third line—where Jeannot is already penciled in—leaving little room for others to showcase their potential.
I haven’t even touched on Viktor Arvidsson yet.
Unless a trade shakes things up, I see Beecher, Lysell, Poitras, Minten, Blumel, Khusnutdinov, and Steeves all battling for just two roster spots—likely in the bottom six, which doesn’t suit players like Poitras or Lysell. Say what you will, the Bruins thrive on internal competition. That’s fine—if you’re putting players in roles that match their strengths. But right now, Boston isn’t doing that.
I’m typically pretty patient when it comes to lineup projections. I prefer to wait for training camp and preseason before diving into those discussions. Sure, everyone’s already sharing their lineup predictions, but without seeing how things unfold, it’s mostly guesswork. You never know who’s going to turn heads in camp—just look at Poitras two years ago. Hardly anyone had him pegged to crack the roster, though I did say not to sleep on him.
But the vibe this year strongly suggest someone who should be on the roster won’t be.
August 15 marks the deadline for NHL teams to sign players they’ve drafted that took the NCAA route. If those players remain unsigned by that date, they become free agents eligible to sign with any team.
Even if those players have signed an AHL contract, they will still become unrestricted free agents at the NHL level if their drafting team doesn’t sign them by the deadline—allowing them to join any NHL club.
However, such signings are exceedingly rare—rarer even than offer sheets. It often feels like there’s an unspoken code among NHL teams to avoid poaching players who are under AHL contracts.
The upcoming UFA class isn’t exactly a star-studded lineup. Setting bias aside, Bruins’ prospect Ty Gallagher might be the most promising of the group—despite being the second lowest draft pick, taken 217th overall in 2021. On the other end of the spectrum, Jack Hughes (not that one) was the highest selection, drafted 51st overall by the Kings in 2022. Yet, his collegiate career never quite took off, with two underwhelming seasons at Northeastern followed by two more at Boston University.
So, if you’re hoping the Bruins can find some help here, I think you’ll be waiting a while.
The Hlinka-Gretzky Cup serves as the unofficial kickoff to the 2026 NHL Entry Draft season. Unlike its counterpart, the IIHF World Junior Championship Under-18, all eligible draft prospects born in 2008 can take part if asked. The WJC U-18 takes place from late April to early May, often overlapping with league play and playoffs for many players, therefore are unable to participate.
However, the United States rarely ices its top players for this tournament. Many of the best—often from the National Team Development Program (NTDP)—are typically held back for the U-18 tournament in April. Casey Mutrun, Mikey Berchild and Luke Schairer are a few examples of players who will garner first round consideration not taking part.
Others, such as Šimon Katolický, who could be Czechia’s second ranked draft eligible player, will miss the tournament as he recovers from an appendectomy. Or Adam Novotný who is the Czech’s top ranked prospect, who has aged out for this tournament, as has Gavin McKenna – by 11 days. Ivar Stenberg is the top ranked Swede who has also aged out. A pair of Slovaks – Tobias Tomik and Tomas Chrenko – who will garner first round consideration will also miss this tournament because of age.
Obviously, the absence of the Russian contingent means we won’t get to see talents like Viktor Fyodorov, Yegor Shilov, and Alexei Vlasov—though Shilov and Vlasov are currently competing in the USHL. As a result, this won’t be a true best-on-best tournament. Then again, at this level, few ever are. Still, it presents a valuable opportunity to get an early look at many of the players eligible for the upcoming draft.
This year’s tournament runs from August 11 to 16 in Brno, Czechia, and Trenčín, Slovakia. The 2026 tournament is set to return to Canada, potentially for the final time, as reports from Czechia suggest that beginning in 2027, the event will be permanently hosted in Czechia and Slovakia. This is not an IIHF sanctioned tournament and is run by Hockey Canada and the Czech Ice Hockey Association and Slovak Ice Hockey Federation.
The Bruins enter the season riding high after an impressive June draft, and they’re poised for another standout performance. This year’s prospect pool offers even more depth and talent, setting the stage for exciting developments. Top scouting organizations—including independent services—already have a book on these players. But the true evaluation kicks off with this tournament, where potential starts to materialize.
And yes, I probably watch way too much hockey.
The Bruins have eight picks in 2026 – for now anyway. That includes two firsts – one of which was acquired from the Toronto Maple Leafs in the Brandon Carlo trade – and two fourths – one acquired from the Tampa Bay Lightning when the Bruins swapped their 2025 fourth round pick for it. The Bruins traded away their own fifth round pick in the Charlie Coyle trade.
NHL General Managers are drawn to this tournament, and Bruins GM Don Sweeney is no exception. Known for their commitment to cross-over scouting, the Bruins face logistical challenges (like every team) with the event taking place overseas—making the size of their traveling contingent a point of interest. RyanNadeau is a guaranteed attendee, alongside European scouts P.J. Axelsson, Viktor Nybladh, and Teemu Numminen.
The 2026 draft holds just as much weight for the Bruins as the 2025 draft did—perhaps even more. And like 2025 – you don’t need me to remind you – the Bruins cannot afford to take risks. While fans typically wait for draft guides to drop before forming opinions, this is your opportunity to get ahead of the curve. Take an early look at some of the top prospects, along with hidden gems who may be selected in the later rounds. And as a bonus? You’ll be treated to some high-quality hockey along the way in August.
The countries participating are: Canada, United States, Sweden, Finland, Czechia, Slovakia, Switzerland and Germany.
How to watch:
Canada: TSN/RDS and stream on TSN.ca or TSN+ app
United States: NHL Network (all USA games and the final)
Czechia: CT Sport and CT Sport Plus (all Czechia games including the finals)
Slovakia: TV JOJ
Finland: TV5 and HBO Max
Switzerland, Sweden and Germany: Check here for broadcasts and stream closer to the games.
The schedule is as follows:
Saturday, Aug. 9 (pre-tournament):
Sweden – Finland (Piešťany), 11:00 / 5:00 AM
Czechia – USA (Brno), 17:00 / 11:00 AM
Slovakia – Canada (Piešťany), 18:00 / 12:00 PM
Monday, Aug. 11:
Canada – Finland (A, Brno), 15:30 / 9:30 AM
Germany – Sweden (B, Trenčín), 15:30 / 9:30 AM
Czechia – Switzerland (A, Brno), 19:00 / 1:00 PM
Slovakia – USA (B, Trenčín), 19:00 / 1:00 PM
Tuesday, Aug. 12:
Switzerland – Canada (A, Brno), 15:30 / 9:30 AM
Sweden – USA (B, Trenčín), 15:30 / 9:30 AM
Czechia – Finland (A, Brno), 19:00 / 1:00 PM
Slovakia – Germany (B, Trenčín), 19:00 / 1:00 PM
Wednesday, Aug. 13:
Finland – Switzerland (A, Brno), 15:30 / 9:30 AM
USA – Germany (B, Trenčín), 15:30 / 9:30 AM
Czechia – Canada (A, Brno), 19:00 / 1:00 PM
Slovakia – Sweden (B, Trenčín), 19:00 / 1:00 PM
Friday, Aug. 15:
Game for 5th/6th places (Brno/Trenčín), 15:30 / 9:30 AM
Game for 7th/8th places (Brno/Trenčín), 15:30 / 9:30 AM
Semifinal (Brno), 19:00 / 1:00 PM
Semifinal (Trenčín), 19:00 / 1:00 PM
Saturday, Aug. 16:
Game for 3rd/4th places (Brno/Trenčín), 17:00 / 11:00 AM
Final (Brno/Trenčín), 17:00 / 11:00 AM
While playing in the Hlinka Gretzky Cup doesn’t guarantee an NHL draft selection, it often serves as an early showcase for emerging talent. In last year’s NHL Entry Draft, Canada led with 19 players selected, followed closely by Sweden with 18. The United States saw 9 selections, Czechia had 6, while Finland, Germany, and Slovakia each produced 3 draftees. Switzerland, however, had none. Still, for many young players, the tournament marks a crucial first step in their journey toward professional hockey.
If you have any questions, drop them here and I will answer as many as I can in an upcoming mailbag.
Here is a look at the full eight rosters participating (note some players are not eligible until the 2027 draft):
Here is a “never too early” list of potential first round picks to keep an eye on:
It’s fair to say that many fans may be bracing for a season lacking excitement—and that expectation might not be far off. But I dug into a few numbers that could offer something to look forward to: some realistic, some ambitious, and others simply intriguing, even if they don’t directly impact the upcoming campaign.
It is the dog days of summer.
1 – Michael DiPietro needs one win for his first career NHL win.
2 – Fabian Lysell is 2 goals shy of doubling his previous high.
3 – Henri Jokiharju needs 3 points to reach 100 career points.
4 – Jeremy Swayman needs 4 shutouts to reach 20 career NHL shutouts.
5 – Viktor Arvidsson needs 5 assists to reach 200 career assists.
6 – Viktor Arvidsson needs 6 goals to reach 200 career goals.
7 – Tanner Jeannot needs 7 points to reach 100 career points.
8 – David Pastrnak needs 8 powerplay goals to surpass Cam Neely for 5th most in Bruins’ history.
9 – The Bruins 9th point of the season will be their 7900th in their history.
10 – Jeremy Swayman needs to play in 10 games to reach the 200th of his career.
11 – Viktor Arvidsson needs 11 points to reach 400 career points.
12 – Just try and name the Bruins starting 12 forwards on opening night.
13 – The Bruins 13th win of the season will be the 3450th in their history.
14 – David Pastrnak needs 14 GWG to surpass Phil Esposito for fourth most in Bruins’ history.
15 – Mark Kastelic is 15 penalty minutes away from 300 career penalty minutes.
16 – Most GWG in a season by Phil Esposito 1970-71 and 1971-72.
17 – Jeremy Swayman is 17 saves away from career save 4800.
18 – Hampus Lindholm needs to play 18 games to surpass last season’s total played.
19 – Casey Mittelstadt needs 19 goals to reach 100 career goals.
20 – John Beecher is 20 games away from his 150th career NHL game.
21 – Casey Mittelstadt is the 21st player to wear #11. Hope he is better than most the previous 20.
22 – The Bruins need to honor Brad Park.
23 – Just try and name the Bruins 23-man roster on opening night!
24 – Matthew Poitras needs 24 points to reach 50 career points.
25 – Pavel Zacha needs 25 goals to reach 150 career NHL goals.
26 – Marco Sturm needs 26 wins to surpass Joe Sacco for 27 place in all-time wins by a Bruins coach.
27 – Hampus Lindholm is plus-27 away from reaching plus-100 for his Bruins career.
28 – Morgan Geekie needs 28 goals to reach 100 NHL goals.
29 – David Pastrnak needs 4 overtime points to reach 29, most by a Boston Bruins player.
30 – Marco Sturm is 30 losses away from tying Joe Sacco for 25th most in Bruins’ history.
31 – Elias Lindholm needs 31 points to reach 400 career points.
32 – Nikita Zadorov needs 32 points to reach 200 career points.
33 – Pavel Zacha needs 33 assists to reach 250 career assists.
34 – David Pastrnak needs 34 even strength goals to surpass Brad Marchand for 2nd all-time.
35 – David Pastrnak needs 35 even strength assists to move past Phil Esposito and Rick Middleton and into 9th spot on the Bruins all-time list.
36 – David Pastrnak needs 36 goals to move him past Ray Bourque, Rick Middleton, Brad Marchand and Patrice Bergeron and into sole possession of third place on the Bruins career goal list.
37 – Pavel Zacha needs 37 points to reach 200 in his Bruins career.
38 – Charlie McAvoy needs 38 points to pass Torey Krug for 9th all-time among Bruins’ defensemen.
39 – Sean Kuraly is 39 games away from breaking the 600 NHL game mark.
40 – Most wins by a goaltender in one season – Pete Peters 1982-83, Linus Ullmark 2022-23. Also, most losses by a goaltender in one season – Eddie Johnston 1963-64.
41 – Morgan Geekie needs 41 points to reach 200 NHL Points.
42 – Only 5 Bruins defensemen have scored more GWG than Charlie McAvoy. He’s only 42 behind Ray Bourque for top spot and just 8 behind Bobby Orr for second all-time.
43 – Jeremy Swayman is 43 starts away from tying Gerry Cheevers for 5th in Bruins’ career starts.
44 – David Pastrnak needs to play 44 games to reach 800 career games.
45 – Casey Mittelstadt needs 45 assists to reach 200 career assists.
46 – Mason Lohrei is a plus-46 from becoming a career plus player.
47 – Charlie McAvoy is 47th with 300 points in Bruins’ history, 44 points behind Milan Lucic in 37th.
48 – Pavel Zacha is 48 points from moving from 89th in Bruins scoring to 75th.
49 – Andrew Raycroft is the 49th youngest NHL goaltender to win his first NHL game and the youngest Bruins (20 years and 158 days).
50 – The number 50 has only been used 6 times by the Bruins and never more than one season.
51 – Most even strength goals in a season by Phil Esposito in 1970-71.
52 – Matthew Poitras is 52nd in Bruins’ history in points/60 with 1.785.
53 – Bob Essensa is 53rd in NHL history for points by a goaltender with 15.
54 – Nikita Zadorov needs 54 penalty minutes to reach 900 career penalty minutes.
55 – Total combined NHL career games of Matej Blumel, Alex Steeves, Fraser Minten and Michael DiPietro.
56 – David Pastrnak needs 56 points to move him past Bobby Orr into 7th place on the Bruins all time points list.
57 – Sean Kuraly needs 57 penalty minutes to reach 400 career penalty minutes.
58 – Pavel Zacha needs 58 points to reach 400 career points.
59 – Hampus Lindholm needs 59 penalty minutes to reach 500 career penalty minutes.
60 – Pavel Zacha has never had a 60-point season. He’s reached 59 and 57.
61 – Career high in goals for David Pastrnak came three seasons ago.
62 – 1962-63 was the Bruins first full season of my lifetime.
63 – Pavel Zacha is 63 hits away from 300 in his Bruins career and 34th all-time.
64 – Charlie McAvoy is 64 hits away from tying Patrice Bergeron for 4th all-time.
65 – The Bruins have never had the 65th pick in the NHL Entry Draft/Amateur Draft
66 – David Pastrnak needs 66 points to move him past Rick Middleton for 6th place on the Bruins all time points list and top right winger.
67 – Morgan Geekie needs to play in 67 games to reach 400 career games.
68 – David Pastrnak is 68 game winning assists away from being the Bruins’ all-time leader.
69 – Hampus Lindholm is 69 assists away from breaking the 300 mark.
70 – Michael Eyssimont needs 70 penalty minutes to reach 300 career penalty minutes.
71 – Charlie McAvoy is 71st in Bruins’ history in points/60 with 1.544.
72 – No player has worn number 72 since Frank Vatrano in 2018.
73 – Bruce Cassidy coached 73 games for the Bruins in the playoffs, 2nd only to Claude Julien (98).
74 – 1974 Stanley Cup final was the most disappointing for me as the Bruins lost to the Flyers.
75 – Intentionally left blank.
76 – 1976 was perhaps the saddest year in Bruins’ history when Bobby Orr signed with Chicago.
77 – Nikita Zadorov needs to play in 77 games to reach 800 career games.
78 – Charlie McAvoy is 78th in even strength points/60 in Bruins’ history.
79 – Was 1979 the Bruins best draft ever?
80 – The number 80 has only been worn one time by a Bruins, Daniel Vladar in 2020-21.
81 – Marco Sturm is 81st in Bruins scoring with 106 goals and 87 assists in 302 games.
82 – Mason Lohrei is 82 games away from 200 career games.
83 – There have been 83 penalty shots taken by the Bruins in their history. They scored on 28 of them.
Columbus Blue Jackets Forward Yegor Chinakhov has asked for a trade. Photo by Aaron Doster – USA Today Sports.
The simple answer is yes, why not?
Chinakhov’s agent, Shumi Babaev, announced on Twitter/X Thursday that his client has requested a trade and has no intention of returning to Russia, stating, ‘As long as I can play in the NHL.
Yegor Chinakhov: I had some misunderstandings with the coach during the season. Now I would be glad to have a trade. I would like to move to a different location. Will I return to Russia? As long as I can play in the NHL, I will keep developing here @BlueJacketsNHLpic.twitter.com/DQ1qU2oHFb
Chinakhov is a former first round pick – 21st overall – in 2020. Interestingly, it’s the same spot Fabian Lysell was selected one year later.
Chinakhov has played in 175 NHL games, tallying 34 goals and 37 assists. His breakout came during the 2023–24 season, when he posted career highs with 16 goals and 13 assists over 53 games. However, last season saw a dip in production—just 7 goals and 8 assists in 30 games—and that’s when tensions began to surface.
The left-shooting right winger, standing 6’1″ and weighing 201 pounds, was enjoying a strong season. Averaging nearly 16 minutes of ice time per game, he recorded 47 hits, 10 blocked shots, and an impressive 140 shot attempts—48.6% of which hit the target. He ranked third among Blue Jackets forwards in power-play usage, logging 1:59 per game. Over his first 21 games of the season, he notched 7 goals and 7 assists.
On November 27, he played his final game before missing the next 39 contests due to a lingering back injury. The issue actually dates back to the 2023–24 season, when he was sidelined for the final 17 games. Despite reporting to camp, he battled persistent back pain through the early part of the season. During the offseason, he consulted with as many as six doctors in search of a solution, ultimately opting against surgery.
When Chinakhov returned to the lineup on March 4, the Blue Jackets were still clinging to playoff hopes. However, his impact was minimal. In the eight games following his return, the team posted a disappointing 1-6-1 record, and their postseason chances quickly faded. Chinakhov was subsequently made a healthy scratch, appearing in just one additional game the rest of the way.
I completely understand that the Blue Jackets had to prioritize the team and make decisions in the club’s best interest. While it’s not about making excuses for Chinakhov, it’s worth noting that eight games simply weren’t enough for him to regain game shape, restore his timing, or rebuild his confidence after missing half the season. If I were the head coach, I likely would’ve made the same call. That said, any team considering acquiring Chinakhov should have one primary concern: the status of his back.
Chinakhov carries a cap hit of $2.1 million for the upcoming season. He will be a restricted free agent with arbitration rights next July. According to our friends at Benchrates, Chinakhov has played above his contract. (Click the Benchrates logo below for player cards).
Chinakhov possesses a lethal shot—both his wrist and snap shots are released quickly and with pinpoint accuracy. He’s demonstrated the ability to beat NHL goaltenders from range using either. His playmaking is relatively average, as he occasionally struggles with passing precision—a surprising contrast given the accuracy of his shot. If there’s one area of concern in his game, it’s his skating. While he’s effective at gaining the offensive zone, he lacks top-end speed, and his technique limits his edgework, which can be considered average.
Another potential concern is Chinakhov’s defensive play. He’s committed to blocking shots and shows a solid understanding of positional responsibilities in his own zone. However, his limited speed can hinder his ability to consistently execute, and at times, a lack of effort has also been noticeable.
While those concerns exist, they’re certainly fixable—provided Chinakhov is willing to put in the work and the team exercises some patience. Unlike the Bruins’ recent additions like Matej Blumel and Alex Steeves, who were brought in as potential offensive wildcards, Chinakhov has already demonstrated he can produce at the NHL level.
It’s worth a call to Blue Jackets GM Don Waddell to gauge what Columbus might be looking for.