
This marks the final installment of the Bruins prospect report following the conclusion of the 2025–26 season. Parts one, two, and three have already broken down the earlier segments of the pipeline, leaving this as the closing chapter in the series.
There’s been plenty of movement compared to last year’s rankings — partly because the 2025 draft class injected a fresh wave of talent, and partly because several players have aged out of prospect status for the purposes of this report. The cutoff remains firm: only players who will be under 25 as of September 15 are included. That means names like Michael DiPietro and Georgii Merkulov, who once headlined these lists, are no longer part of the prospect pool for this exercise.
The players included here are those drafted by the Bruins or signed as organizational free agents. Depth pieces like Ty Gallagher and Jake Schmaltz, despite being under AHL contracts, are excluded — Boston no longer technically holds their rights, and thus they fall outside the scope of this prospect report.
Goaltenders are also absent from this list. With the uncertainty surrounding Boston’s long‑term crease picture — and Max Lundgren standing as the only goalie prospect under contract — my sample size simply isn’t large enough to evaluate him fairly. Including him here would have put him in an unrealistic spot.
Here’s a breakdown of the ratings:
Hockey IQ: This encompasses a wide range of traits — reading the play, vision, finding soft ice, understanding spacing, maintaining proper positioning (including defensively), making the right plays and more.
Skating: It’s not solely about straight‑line speed, though that’s part of the equation. The focus also falls on edgework, acceleration, stops and starts, first‑step quickness, mechanics, lateral mobility, backward skating, and overall fluidity.
Shot: This covers a player’s full shooting arsenal — power, release, deception, accuracy, and the ability to get pucks off cleanly under pressure.
Puck Moving: Despite the name, it’s about far more than simply transporting the puck up ice. It includes zone‑entry ability, passing touch, possession strength, transition efficiency, and making the right reads under pressure.
Compete: This reflects a player’s overall drive — intensity, forechecking pressure, board‑battle engagement, willingness to get to the dirty areas, involvement in scrums, commitment to defending with the same effort they bring offensively, relentlessness in puck pursuit, will do anything to win and consistency from shift to shift.
Everything in the right column is fairly self‑explanatory. The skills on the left, however, tend to translate more cleanly to the next level than those on the right. How each ultimately develops on the right is something only time will reveal.
It’s worth underscoring that a player’s toolkit is being measured against peers at the same stage, and there’s no guarantee those strengths will carry over as the competition stiffens. These rankings reflect my assessment of each player’s likelihood of reaching their projected ceiling but also the tools they display today.
Now lets get to it:



























